The Solar System formed
from the collapse of a molecular cloud
consisting mostly of hydrogen, but also
containing heavier elements. As the cloud
collapsed, its central region began to heat
up until eventually the hot ‘proto-Sun’ was
formed. The planets formed by the
accretion of material from within this cloud.
Due to their high boiling points, only metals
and silicates could exist in solid form in the
hot, inner regions of the early Solar System.
More volatile elements either remained
gaseous or were blown away by the Sun’s
energy. Since this heavy material existed
mainly in the inner regions of the Solar
System, the planets that formed there are
small and rocky. In the cold outer reaches
of the Solar System, compounds with low
melting points could remain in solid form.
These ices were also much more abundant
than the heavier elements. The outer
planets were therefore able to grow much
larger, and held onto large atmospheres of
hydrogen and helium gas.
homeowners insurance Claim
home insurance Claim
state farm car insurance Claim
comprehensive insurance Claim
commercial insurance Claim
cheap auto insurance Claim
cheap health insurance Claim
indemnity Claim
car insurance companies Claim
progressive quote Claim
usaa car insurance Claim
insurance near me Claim
term life insurance Claim
auto insurance near me Claim
state farm car insurance Claim
comprehensive insurance Claim
progressive home insurance Claim
house insurance Claim
progressive renters insurance Claim
state farm insurance quote Claim
metlife auto insurance Claim
best insurance companies Claim
progressive auto insurance quote Claim
cheap car insurance quotes Claim
allstate car insurance Claim
rental car insurance Claim
car insurance online Claim
liberty mutual car insurance Claim
cheap car insurance near me Claim
best auto insurance Claim
home insurance companies Claim
usaa home insurance Claim
list of car insurance companies Claim
full coverage insurance Claim
allstate insurance near me Claim
cheap insurance quotes Claim
national insurance Claim
progressive home insurance Claim
house insurance Claim
health insurance quotes Claim
ameritas dental Claim
state farm renters insurance Claim
medicare supplement plans Claim
progressive renters insurance Claim
aetna providers Claim
title insurance Claim
sr22 insurance Claim
medicare advantage plans Claim
aetna health insurance Claim
ambetter insurance Claim
umr insurance Claim
massmutual 401k Claim
private health insurance Claim
assurant renters insurance Claim
assurant insurance Claim
dental insurance plans Claim
state farm insurance quote Claim
health insurance plans Claim
workers compensation insurance Claim
geha dental Claim
metlife auto insurance Claim
boat insurance Claim
aarp insurance Claim
costco insurance Claim
flood insurance Claim
best insurance companies Claim
cheap car insurance quotes Claim
best travel insurance Claim
insurance agents near me Claim
car insurance Claim
car insurance quotes Claim
auto insurance Claim
auto insurance quotes Claim
long term care insurance Claim
auto insurance companies Claim
home insurance quotes Claim
cheap car insurance quotes Claim
affordable car insurance Claim
professional liability insurance Claim
cheap car insurance near me Claim
small business insurance Claim
vehicle insurance Claim
best auto insurance Claim
full coverage insurance Claim
motorcycle insurance quote Claim
homeowners insurance quote Claim
errors and omissions insurance Claim
general liability insurance Claim
best renters insurance Claim
cheap home insurance Claim
cheap insurance near me Claim
cheap full coverage insurance Claim
cheap life insurance Claim
Could direct air capture prevent climate change?
Direct Air Capture (DAC) is an appealing
way to tackle climate change: just pass
ambient air over chemicals that absorb the
CO2 driving global warming, and then use or
store the CO2. DAC differs from the
better-known carbon capture and storage
(CCS) in that it can be done anywhere, not
just at big sources of CO2 such as power
stations. It’s more effective than natural CO2
‘scrubbing’ using trees and plants, and can
be performed where the CO2 is most easily
stored or re-used.
Like CCS, however, DAC faces the
problem of ensuring the CO2 never escapes.
Unlike CCS at power stations, DAC must
be effective at removing the far more dilute
CO2 in ambient air. This demands special
equipment and chemicals, plus renewable
energy sources producing zero CO2. That
has led to grave doubts about the
economic viability of DAC. For now, it
remains an intriguing but impractical
remedy for global warming.
way to tackle climate change: just pass
ambient air over chemicals that absorb the
CO2 driving global warming, and then use or
store the CO2. DAC differs from the
better-known carbon capture and storage
(CCS) in that it can be done anywhere, not
just at big sources of CO2 such as power
stations. It’s more effective than natural CO2
‘scrubbing’ using trees and plants, and can
be performed where the CO2 is most easily
stored or re-used.
Like CCS, however, DAC faces the
problem of ensuring the CO2 never escapes.
Unlike CCS at power stations, DAC must
be effective at removing the far more dilute
CO2 in ambient air. This demands special
equipment and chemicals, plus renewable
energy sources producing zero CO2. That
has led to grave doubts about the
economic viability of DAC. For now, it
remains an intriguing but impractical
remedy for global warming.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)